Leading in the queer and now: Reflections on disruptive pedagogies during change at a Ballet Conservatoire, Dr Jamieson Dryburgh, PFHEA
Abstract
What does it mean for an educational leader to approach learning disruptively during institutional change? How might one unsettle that which is already in jeopardous flux?
As the Director of Higher Education at a London-based Ballet Conservatoire, I reflect on the troubled hope of disruptive pedagogies utilising a queer(er) positionality. I consider what it means to lead a teaching community guided by the aims of critical pedagogies during a period of significant change. Arising from this reflection are insights of unsettling leadership and precarious certitude.
Central School of Ballet is a small-specialist provider of higher education. Over the last two years, since my appointment, the school has moved premises, appointed a new executive team, completed a quality and standards review, become a self-registered provider with the Office for Students, navigated embodied practices through pandemic lockdowns and faced significantly impactful funding cuts. In a parallel redefinition of purpose, on a personal level my appointment as leader in an aesthetically-different setting obliged a shift from being a studio-based teacher of twenty-five years to the other side of the desk where my influence on/in the learning environment is less directly connected to learners.
This paper is an in-depth reflection of the conflictual experiences of applying the principles of critical pedagogy such as demonstrable care, student empowerment and collective effort (hooks 1994) in an institutional culture and leadership role of fecund potentiality, resistances and destabilisation. Pivotal in this reflection is the enactment of leading queerly. To queer is to disrupt the normalizing, privileging, compulsory, and dominant modes of social organization that characterize historically heterosexist and normalizing cultures (O’Malley et al., 2018). Thus, to lead queerly is to engage with the discomforting forces of disruption that are potentially transformative at the individual, collective, community and institutional level (Quilty 2011).
Disruption has occurred through the cultivation an inquiry-oriented School culture. For example, staff development initiatives have foregrounded embodied knowledges, strategies of inclusion and relevant frameworks of learning enhancement. Consequently, the disruptive influence of queer flows through teachers and learning support staff who are increasingly enabled to ask questions of their pedagogical approaches and seek to ‘spoil’ (Madison 2012) their own practices. The hope in this emergent culture is that teacher inquiry models transformation through the vulnerability of not knowing and collective effort of stimulating learning.
References
- hooks, bell. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom.
- Routledge. Madison, D. S. (2012). Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance.
- Sage Publications, Ltd. O’Malley, M. P., Asher, N., Beck, B. L., Capper, C. A., Lugg, C. A., Murphy, J. P., & Whitlock, R. U. (2018).
- Asking queer(er) questions: epistemological and methodological implications for qualitative inquirers.
- International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(7), 572–594.
- Quilty, A. (2017). Queer provocations! Exploring queerly informed disruptive pedagogies within feminist community-higher-education landscapes. Irish Educational Studies, 36(1), 107–123.